What Tommy Tuberville's Eight August 2026 PTR Amendments Actually Changed

The Senate eFD system shows amendments tied to reports originally filed in April, June, September, and November 2024; February, May, and November 2025; and January 2026. The November 2024 report received two amendments on August 5, so the narrowest count is eight report groups and nine amendment submissions.

Using the latest version of each report group—and the second amendment for the November 2024 report—produces 165 rows. Those rows consist of 152 joint-account transactions and 13 self-owned transactions. They include 40 purchases, 98 full sales, and 27 partial sales.

Adding the lower and upper bounds of the official amount bands yields approximately $2.45 million to $7.78 million. That is a range derived from disclosure bands, not an exact value, and it measures the reports' transaction rows rather than new August 2026 trading.

Five original Senate reports remain directly addressable through their official report IDs: April 15, 2024; June 14, 2024; September 13, 2024; May 15, 2025; and January 15, 2026. Their row counts are 19, 94, 6, 16, and 5, respectively—a combined 140 rows.

The corresponding August 5 amendments retain exactly those same row counts. A row-by-row comparison found no changes to transaction date, owner, ticker, asset, security type, amount band, or comment in those five report pairs. Eleven rows changed only in the transaction-type field.

That comparison is decisive for interpretation: an amendment's August 5 filing date does not reset the original public-disclosure date for every unchanged row. Treating all 140 rows as newly disclosed on August 5 would erase the earlier official filings that already contained them.

Ten of the 11 verified changes in the five paired reports reclassified a sale from full to partial. The affected tickers include Apple, CSX, JPMorgan, Alphabet, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, and another Apple row in the January 2026 report.

The other verified change appears in the 94-row June 2024 report: a May 3 Humacyte row in the $15,001-$50,000 band changed from a purchase to a full sale. The date, joint ownership, ticker, asset name, amount band, and all other rows in that report remained the same.

The November 2024 report's second August 5 amendment also changes the Owens Corning row from a full sale in Amendment 1 to a partial sale in Amendment 2. Researchers should therefore use the second amendment as the current version and avoid double-counting both amendment submissions.

Congressional Trader's production data, checked through records created at 14:50 UTC on August 6, contained 46 parsed rows dated August 5 across the nine amendment-source IDs. The feed calculated delays from each old transaction date to the amendment date, producing apparent gaps of 231 to 876 days in the visible rows; the complete official set would extend to 880 days.

That is not the correct delay for rows already present in an original report. For example, the three sector-fund purchases dated December 17, 2025 appear in the official January 15, 2026 original, a 29-day gap. The August amendment preserves those purchases while changing the Apple and Alphabet sale labels from full to partial.

The production parser also omitted many no-ticker and full-sale rows from the amended reports and ingested both November 2024 amendments as separate source groups. For this analysis, the official Senate pages control. The live-feed mismatch is useful as a methodology warning, not evidence that Tuberville executed or first disclosed 165 trades in August 2026.

The transaction date describes when the reported security activity occurred. The original filing date describes when that report first became public. The amendment date describes when a later correction became public. All three can matter, but they are not interchangeable.

Senate Ethics guidance says a reportable transaction generally must be disclosed within 30 days of notice and no later than 45 days after the transaction. Whether a row was timely should therefore be measured against its original public filing when the row was already present—not automatically against the date of a later type correction.

The amendments establish corrected labels in the public record. They do not by themselves establish why the original labels were wrong, who noticed the errors, whether an adviser entered them, or whether the Senate Ethics Committee made any finding.

The House passed H.R. 7008, the Stop Insider Trading Act, by 232-198 on July 22. As of August 6, the measure had not passed the Senate or reached the president, so the current PTR disclosure system remains in effect.

A report correction can be consequential without proving misconduct. Accurate purchase-versus-sale and full-versus-partial labels affect portfolio interpretation, but neither an amendment nor a tracker anomaly is evidence of insider trading or a committee-related conflict.